In this analogy, services reliant on public internet use the equivalent of congested, potholed side roads to send your files. Let us, for a moment, compare network and internet traffic with highway traffic. Why MASV’s TCP technology is never a bottleneck Related: How to Evaluate If Web-Based File Transfer or UDP Is Right For Your Business While UDP has developed a reputation as being faster than TCP - mainly because it doesn’t slow down to make sure everyone’s along for the ride (as we’ll see below) - that’s not necessarily the case. This is because UDP doesn’t require many of the strict formalities (such as a “congestion control”) that govern the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), another widely-used protocol for exchanging data on the internet.Īdditionally, with UDP, If data packets (known as datagrams) don’t arrive or arrive corrupted or in the wrong order, the data is not re-sent – as is the case with TCP. ![]() UDP has a reputation of soaking up too much bandwidth for one eventand slowing down other users thanks to its brute-force protocol style. But, it’s also worth noting throttles help distribute bandwidth among multiple users at home or in an office, for example. We’ve talked about the cost implications of bandwidth usage and why some cloud services choose to put the brakes on. Unfortunately, UDP-based file transfer has well-documented reliability and fairness issues. ![]() If your goal is simply to send files to the finish line, UDP is the fastest solution available. Some large file transfer solutions, especially those with expensive on-premises solutions, like Aspera, offer up to 10Gbps connectivity via user datagram protocol (UDP) file transfer. You might be thinking, what of UDP file transfer? UDP is proven to max out speeds and send files as fast as possible. □ Speed Test: MASV vs WeTransfer Pro: MASV 2X Faster in Uploads, 10X in Downloads! There are tricks to speed things up, but not by much – assuming your file isn’t too large for Google Drive’s strict file size limitations (almost a certainty if you work with high-resolution video files).Īnd because many cloud file transfer solutions like WeTransfer are only available via browser, they’re ultimately limited by browser speed even if they were to upgrade their infrastructure. It doesn’t make sense for them to incur significant infrastructure costs when most users don’t need such high performance.įor example, anyone with a 10Gbps connection transferring with Google Drive will inevitably top out at Google Drive’s speed limit. Most consumer-grade file sharing, sync, and transfer services aren’t willing to upgrade to the infrastructure or pay the extra server egress fees needed to accommodate gigabit-grade data transfer.įreemium-style platforms such as WeTransfer are available for free or through a relatively low monthly fee. The answer, just as I mentioned above, is money. So with that in mind, let’s talk why some cloud file transfer tools deliberately choose to be slow(er) than expected, especially if you have a Linus-level 10Gbps connection. ![]() To get the most out of that expensive connection, users must optimize their entire network and infrastructure to handle such speeds - including their cloud file transfer solution. That includes all your hardware, cables, applications, and configurations (along with whether or not you use WiFi and, if you do, how often you use your microwave oven).ĭong Knows Tech provides a great rundown of potential bottlenecks in your network.Īlthough networking technology has advanced a great deal since Linus made his video in 2019, the bottleneck problem hasn’t changed much for large studios and post houses who have invested in a costly 10Gbps connection. All those upgrades cost time, money, and energy.Īs we explain in our network congestion blog post, download and upload performance (and, therefore, overall file transfer turnaround time) are only as fast as the weakest link in your network. To accommodate all that bandwidth, cloud services would require powerful servers, better cooling, maintenance, etc. They also help network providers manage their costs. Bottlenecks suck but they help keep computer hardware and software from getting overwhelmed and crashing all together.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |